Using SQL Server 2000...
I'm creating a series of database diagrams for a database that has
~ 200 tables. The tables are segmented by module, so instead of
having one massive diagram I am creating a diagram per module.
All I'm doing is creating a new diagram, selecting all the tables
that belong to a module, and letting the software create the
diagram. I do make some format/layout changes to make the
diagram easier to read, but at no time am I making any structural
changes to the table.
For three of the four modules this approach has worked perfectly.
However, there is one set of tables that the tool thinks has been
altered, and it insists on writing the tables back to the database
before it will save it. The first time this happened I just said "No"
to any writing/saving and started over from scratch (I assumed I
had accidentally made a change to a table). The next time I added
all the module's tables, I simply moved one table two or three
inches to the left, and then tried to save the daigram (having 100%
confidence there were no accidental structural changes). Once
again, it wanted to write a few of the tables back to the database
before saving.
I have no idea why it thinks any structural changes occured to the
referenced tables. I certainly didn't make any, and on the rare
occasion I have accidentally made a change, I was able to
successfully start over by not writing/saving the change and
closing/opening the diagram.
Can anyone let me know what possible changes could have been
applied to a table(s) outside the diagram tool, that could affect the
diagram tool and make it think it needs to write the tables to the
database before saving?
ThanksHi Garth,
I don't know the answer to your question because I don't like, or use the
SQL Server diagramming tool - for the exact reason you're experiencing ...
changes to the diagram make changes to the database.
While I used to use ER/win (which is a fantastic tool), I've shifted to
Visio. Now, without the developer edition (I think that's the one) you can't
do a forward engineer, but you can reverse engineer any DB you can connect
to (ODBC, OLE DB, etc), it provides at least 80% of what matters in ER/win
(or Rational Rose) and you have the advantage that anyone with Visio can
read the file.
I admit it's going to be hard to learn it (as there is virtually no one on
the boards who know how), but I find it far, far superior to what is
available in SQL Server and more convenient than anything else.
Thanks,
Jay
"Garth Wells" <nobody@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:eQq7Mx1FIHA.4712@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Using SQL Server 2000...
> I'm creating a series of database diagrams for a database that has
> ~ 200 tables. The tables are segmented by module, so instead of
> having one massive diagram I am creating a diagram per module.
> All I'm doing is creating a new diagram, selecting all the tables
> that belong to a module, and letting the software create the
> diagram. I do make some format/layout changes to make the
> diagram easier to read, but at no time am I making any structural
> changes to the table.
> For three of the four modules this approach has worked perfectly.
> However, there is one set of tables that the tool thinks has been
> altered, and it insists on writing the tables back to the database
> before it will save it. The first time this happened I just said "No"
> to any writing/saving and started over from scratch (I assumed I
> had accidentally made a change to a table). The next time I added
> all the module's tables, I simply moved one table two or three
> inches to the left, and then tried to save the daigram (having 100%
> confidence there were no accidental structural changes). Once
> again, it wanted to write a few of the tables back to the database
> before saving.
> I have no idea why it thinks any structural changes occured to the
> referenced tables. I certainly didn't make any, and on the rare
> occasion I have accidentally made a change, I was able to
> successfully start over by not writing/saving the change and
> closing/opening the diagram.
> Can anyone let me know what possible changes could have been
> applied to a table(s) outside the diagram tool, that could affect the
> diagram tool and make it think it needs to write the tables to the
> database before saving?
> Thanks
>
>
Showing posts with label behavior. Show all posts
Showing posts with label behavior. Show all posts
Sunday, March 11, 2012
diagram object behavior in EM
Dear Collective Wisdom,
Noticed something odd back when we first upgraded to XP in that when one
goes to view an existing relational diagram object for a database in
Enterprise Manager, everything appears blank in the diagram. New
diagrams, OTOH, can be created and viewed without any problem. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
gms--
Maybe this link will help you:
http://www.yiapap.com/bldiagra.htm
Cristian Lefter, SQL Server MVP
"Greg M. Silverman" <gmsRE@.MOVEumn.MEeduAT.COM> wrote in message
news:d48i5q$1m8$1@.lenny.tc.umn.edu...
> Dear Collective Wisdom,
> Noticed something odd back when we first upgraded to XP in that when one
> goes to view an existing relational diagram object for a database in
> Enterprise Manager, everything appears blank in the diagram. New
> diagrams, OTOH, can be created and viewed without any problem. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> gms--
|||Cristian Lefter wrote:
> Maybe this link will help you:
> http://www.yiapap.com/bldiagra.htm
> Cristian Lefter, SQL Server MVP
Thanks for the link... I did find this also info in the depths of
Technet, have yet to try it.
gms--
> "Greg M. Silverman" <gmsRE@.MOVEumn.MEeduAT.COM> wrote in message
> news:d48i5q$1m8$1@.lenny.tc.umn.edu...
>
>
|||Greg M. Silverman wrote:
> Cristian Lefter wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link... I did find this also info in the depths of
> Technet, have yet to try it.
>
> gms--
>
Ok, just did it and it worked!
Thanks!
gms--
Noticed something odd back when we first upgraded to XP in that when one
goes to view an existing relational diagram object for a database in
Enterprise Manager, everything appears blank in the diagram. New
diagrams, OTOH, can be created and viewed without any problem. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
gms--
Maybe this link will help you:
http://www.yiapap.com/bldiagra.htm
Cristian Lefter, SQL Server MVP
"Greg M. Silverman" <gmsRE@.MOVEumn.MEeduAT.COM> wrote in message
news:d48i5q$1m8$1@.lenny.tc.umn.edu...
> Dear Collective Wisdom,
> Noticed something odd back when we first upgraded to XP in that when one
> goes to view an existing relational diagram object for a database in
> Enterprise Manager, everything appears blank in the diagram. New
> diagrams, OTOH, can be created and viewed without any problem. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> gms--
|||Cristian Lefter wrote:
> Maybe this link will help you:
> http://www.yiapap.com/bldiagra.htm
> Cristian Lefter, SQL Server MVP
Thanks for the link... I did find this also info in the depths of
Technet, have yet to try it.
gms--
> "Greg M. Silverman" <gmsRE@.MOVEumn.MEeduAT.COM> wrote in message
> news:d48i5q$1m8$1@.lenny.tc.umn.edu...
>
>
|||Greg M. Silverman wrote:
> Cristian Lefter wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link... I did find this also info in the depths of
> Technet, have yet to try it.
>
> gms--
>
Ok, just did it and it worked!
Thanks!
gms--
Friday, March 9, 2012
DeviceInfo in .config file (SQL RS 2000)
Hi,
I am trying to change the default behavior of .CSV Renderer, by specifying NoHeader=false in the RSReportServer.config file. The exact info specified is here:
<Configuration>
<DeviceInfo>
<NoHeader>true</NoHeader>
</DeviceInfo>
</Configuration>
Unfortunately even after restarting the reporting services, the changes don't apply and i still get 'Header' as part of the .CSV export.
Would appreciate if anyone could guide me as what is wrong here..
thanks
sreeram.
Ram,
This feature (default DeviceInfo settings in config file) was implemented in RS2005. It is not in RS2000.
Labels:
behavior,
config,
csv,
database,
default,
deviceinfo,
exact,
file,
microsoft,
mysql,
noheaderfalse,
oracle,
renderer,
rsreportserver,
server,
specifying,
sql
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)