I have a bunch of portable machines on which I do development, and I was
wondering if anyone has any great mechanisms for doing synch between all the
machines. Any preferences? I looked at pub and subscribe, but it seems
needlessly complex for this as well as the fact that any of the databases may
be online or offline at any time, and the changes can occur anywhere.
Any thoughts?
If its uni-directional data flow I would use transactional replication from
the publisher to the dev machines and pull it use Windows Synchronization
Manager. If you need bi-directional data flow use merge replication.
While the technology is complex, it is very solid.
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"IronYuppie" <IronYuppie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B54EB332-4FD6-4D4A-9775-885F529CE25F@.microsoft.com...
>I have a bunch of portable machines on which I do development, and I was
> wondering if anyone has any great mechanisms for doing synch between all
> the
> machines. Any preferences? I looked at pub and subscribe, but it seems
> needlessly complex for this as well as the fact that any of the databases
> may
> be online or offline at any time, and the changes can occur anywhere.
> Any thoughts?
|||do you have a book that is updated for 2005? I'd buy it on the spot!
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> If its uni-directional data flow I would use transactional replication from
> the publisher to the dev machines and pull it use Windows Synchronization
> Manager. If you need bi-directional data flow use merge replication.
> While the technology is complex, it is very solid.
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
> positions, strategies or opinions.
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "IronYuppie" <IronYuppie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:B54EB332-4FD6-4D4A-9775-885F529CE25F@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Showing posts with label machines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label machines. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Developers on Other Machines (formerly: Problem installing SQL Server Reporting Services )
Bruce:
Sorry for the misposting.
I don't understand what you mean by "you haven't setup your roles for
the developers on other machines." Once a user role (developer or
otherwise) is set up on the server, shouldn't it be in effect no
matter where a user logs in from?
Jody
"Bruce Loehle-Conger (bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com)" wrote:
> Your problem seems different. He was having a problem installing. Your
> problem seems to be accessing it. It looks to me like you haven't setup your
> roles for the developers on other machines.
Bruce L-C
>"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
>news:f9d864c3.0408111251.61c4d16f@.posting.google.com...
>> I'm having a similar problem...
>>
>> Enterprise and Developer set up on one server machine, Developer on
2
>> other desktops. If you access Report Manager from the Server
machine,
>> everything looks fine. But Report Manager accessed from the
>> non-server machines shows the top banner only... No tabs, no
folders,
>> nothing below the line, so a developer can't upload without
switching
>> over to the server, and even then there are often errors.
>>
>> Is there some configuration subtlety we missed?
>>
>> Otherwise this thing is giving me problems with OutOfMemory errors
on
>> local debugs that I know aren't too big.
>>
>> Ideas?
>> Jody
>>I suspect one of two things are happening. You have anonymous access on
which ends up treating everyone as the same regardless of how they are
logged in and they end up not having the permissions you wish them to have.
Or, the developers are either not assigned to a role, or are assigned to a
role that does not have the correct rights, or are assigned to a role with
the correct rights but that role has not been applied to the appropriate
part of the website. Unless you override it, any folder/report inherits the
role assignments from further up the tree. So if you assign the role from
above
My guess is when they are on the server they are not logged in as themselves
but are logged in as the admin for the local machine.
If they log into the server as themselves and the website does not look the
same as when they try to access it from their computers then my reasoning
falls apart.
So, check the the following.
1. Do you have anonymous access turned on?
2. What happens if you log into the server as one of the developers that are
having difficulties.
Bruce L-C
"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
news:f9d864c3.0408120929.8a3b6d7@.posting.google.com...
> Bruce:
> Sorry for the misposting.
> I don't understand what you mean by "you haven't setup your roles for
> the developers on other machines." Once a user role (developer or
> otherwise) is set up on the server, shouldn't it be in effect no
> matter where a user logs in from?
> Jody
> "Bruce Loehle-Conger (bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com)" wrote:
> > Your problem seems different. He was having a problem installing. Your
> > problem seems to be accessing it. It looks to me like you haven't setup
your
> > roles for the developers on other machines.
> Bruce L-C
> >"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
> >news:f9d864c3.0408111251.61c4d16f@.posting.google.com...
> >> I'm having a similar problem...
> >>
> >> Enterprise and Developer set up on one server machine, Developer on
> 2
> >> other desktops. If you access Report Manager from the Server
> machine,
> >> everything looks fine. But Report Manager accessed from the
> >> non-server machines shows the top banner only... No tabs, no
> folders,
> >> nothing below the line, so a developer can't upload without
> switching
> >> over to the server, and even then there are often errors.
> >>
> >> Is there some configuration subtlety we missed?
> >>
> >> Otherwise this thing is giving me problems with OutOfMemory errors
> on
> >> local debugs that I know aren't too big.
> >>
> >> Ideas?
> >> Jody
> >>|||Actually I am the developer, with very minimal network learnin'. I
finally got the guy who installed to look at the research I've been
doing and he ended up reinstalling "paying closer attention to the
configuration options". He did have to do some monkeying around with
the anonymous thing, but he seems to have it working now. We'll see
how it goes if we ever put some actual users on it.
Thanks all for the input. It was a big help.
Jody
"Bruce Loehle-Conger" <bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ur$lBPJgEHA.556@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
> I suspect one of two things are happening. You have anonymous access on
> which ends up treating everyone as the same regardless of how they are
> logged in and they end up not having the permissions you wish them to have.
> Or, the developers are either not assigned to a role, or are assigned to a
> role that does not have the correct rights, or are assigned to a role with
> the correct rights but that role has not been applied to the appropriate
> part of the website. Unless you override it, any folder/report inherits the
> role assignments from further up the tree. So if you assign the role from
> above
> My guess is when they are on the server they are not logged in as themselves
> but are logged in as the admin for the local machine.
> If they log into the server as themselves and the website does not look the
> same as when they try to access it from their computers then my reasoning
> falls apart.
> So, check the the following.
> 1. Do you have anonymous access turned on?
> 2. What happens if you log into the server as one of the developers that are
> having difficulties.
> Bruce L-C
> "JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:f9d864c3.0408120929.8a3b6d7@.posting.google.com...
> > Bruce:
> >
> > Sorry for the misposting.
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean by "you haven't setup your roles for
> > the developers on other machines." Once a user role (developer or
> > otherwise) is set up on the server, shouldn't it be in effect no
> > matter where a user logs in from?
> >
> > Jody
> >
> > "Bruce Loehle-Conger (bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com)" wrote:
> > > Your problem seems different. He was having a problem installing. Your
> > > problem seems to be accessing it. It looks to me like you haven't setup
> your
> > > roles for the developers on other machines.
> >
> > Bruce L-C
> >
> > >"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
> > >news:f9d864c3.0408111251.61c4d16f@.posting.google.com...
> > >> I'm having a similar problem...
> > >>
> > >> Enterprise and Developer set up on one server machine, Developer on
> 2
> > >> other desktops. If you access Report Manager from the Server
> machine,
> > >> everything looks fine. But Report Manager accessed from the
> > >> non-server machines shows the top banner only... No tabs, no
> folders,
> > >> nothing below the line, so a developer can't upload without
> switching
> > >> over to the server, and even then there are often errors.
> > >>
> > >> Is there some configuration subtlety we missed?
> > >>
> > >> Otherwise this thing is giving me problems with OutOfMemory errors
> on
> > >> local debugs that I know aren't too big.
> > >>
> > >> Ideas?
> > >> Jody
> > >>
Sorry for the misposting.
I don't understand what you mean by "you haven't setup your roles for
the developers on other machines." Once a user role (developer or
otherwise) is set up on the server, shouldn't it be in effect no
matter where a user logs in from?
Jody
"Bruce Loehle-Conger (bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com)" wrote:
> Your problem seems different. He was having a problem installing. Your
> problem seems to be accessing it. It looks to me like you haven't setup your
> roles for the developers on other machines.
Bruce L-C
>"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
>news:f9d864c3.0408111251.61c4d16f@.posting.google.com...
>> I'm having a similar problem...
>>
>> Enterprise and Developer set up on one server machine, Developer on
2
>> other desktops. If you access Report Manager from the Server
machine,
>> everything looks fine. But Report Manager accessed from the
>> non-server machines shows the top banner only... No tabs, no
folders,
>> nothing below the line, so a developer can't upload without
switching
>> over to the server, and even then there are often errors.
>>
>> Is there some configuration subtlety we missed?
>>
>> Otherwise this thing is giving me problems with OutOfMemory errors
on
>> local debugs that I know aren't too big.
>>
>> Ideas?
>> Jody
>>I suspect one of two things are happening. You have anonymous access on
which ends up treating everyone as the same regardless of how they are
logged in and they end up not having the permissions you wish them to have.
Or, the developers are either not assigned to a role, or are assigned to a
role that does not have the correct rights, or are assigned to a role with
the correct rights but that role has not been applied to the appropriate
part of the website. Unless you override it, any folder/report inherits the
role assignments from further up the tree. So if you assign the role from
above
My guess is when they are on the server they are not logged in as themselves
but are logged in as the admin for the local machine.
If they log into the server as themselves and the website does not look the
same as when they try to access it from their computers then my reasoning
falls apart.
So, check the the following.
1. Do you have anonymous access turned on?
2. What happens if you log into the server as one of the developers that are
having difficulties.
Bruce L-C
"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
news:f9d864c3.0408120929.8a3b6d7@.posting.google.com...
> Bruce:
> Sorry for the misposting.
> I don't understand what you mean by "you haven't setup your roles for
> the developers on other machines." Once a user role (developer or
> otherwise) is set up on the server, shouldn't it be in effect no
> matter where a user logs in from?
> Jody
> "Bruce Loehle-Conger (bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com)" wrote:
> > Your problem seems different. He was having a problem installing. Your
> > problem seems to be accessing it. It looks to me like you haven't setup
your
> > roles for the developers on other machines.
> Bruce L-C
> >"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
> >news:f9d864c3.0408111251.61c4d16f@.posting.google.com...
> >> I'm having a similar problem...
> >>
> >> Enterprise and Developer set up on one server machine, Developer on
> 2
> >> other desktops. If you access Report Manager from the Server
> machine,
> >> everything looks fine. But Report Manager accessed from the
> >> non-server machines shows the top banner only... No tabs, no
> folders,
> >> nothing below the line, so a developer can't upload without
> switching
> >> over to the server, and even then there are often errors.
> >>
> >> Is there some configuration subtlety we missed?
> >>
> >> Otherwise this thing is giving me problems with OutOfMemory errors
> on
> >> local debugs that I know aren't too big.
> >>
> >> Ideas?
> >> Jody
> >>|||Actually I am the developer, with very minimal network learnin'. I
finally got the guy who installed to look at the research I've been
doing and he ended up reinstalling "paying closer attention to the
configuration options". He did have to do some monkeying around with
the anonymous thing, but he seems to have it working now. We'll see
how it goes if we ever put some actual users on it.
Thanks all for the input. It was a big help.
Jody
"Bruce Loehle-Conger" <bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ur$lBPJgEHA.556@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>...
> I suspect one of two things are happening. You have anonymous access on
> which ends up treating everyone as the same regardless of how they are
> logged in and they end up not having the permissions you wish them to have.
> Or, the developers are either not assigned to a role, or are assigned to a
> role that does not have the correct rights, or are assigned to a role with
> the correct rights but that role has not been applied to the appropriate
> part of the website. Unless you override it, any folder/report inherits the
> role assignments from further up the tree. So if you assign the role from
> above
> My guess is when they are on the server they are not logged in as themselves
> but are logged in as the admin for the local machine.
> If they log into the server as themselves and the website does not look the
> same as when they try to access it from their computers then my reasoning
> falls apart.
> So, check the the following.
> 1. Do you have anonymous access turned on?
> 2. What happens if you log into the server as one of the developers that are
> having difficulties.
> Bruce L-C
> "JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:f9d864c3.0408120929.8a3b6d7@.posting.google.com...
> > Bruce:
> >
> > Sorry for the misposting.
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean by "you haven't setup your roles for
> > the developers on other machines." Once a user role (developer or
> > otherwise) is set up on the server, shouldn't it be in effect no
> > matter where a user logs in from?
> >
> > Jody
> >
> > "Bruce Loehle-Conger (bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com)" wrote:
> > > Your problem seems different. He was having a problem installing. Your
> > > problem seems to be accessing it. It looks to me like you haven't setup
> your
> > > roles for the developers on other machines.
> >
> > Bruce L-C
> >
> > >"JodyT" <datagal@.msn.com> wrote in message
> > >news:f9d864c3.0408111251.61c4d16f@.posting.google.com...
> > >> I'm having a similar problem...
> > >>
> > >> Enterprise and Developer set up on one server machine, Developer on
> 2
> > >> other desktops. If you access Report Manager from the Server
> machine,
> > >> everything looks fine. But Report Manager accessed from the
> > >> non-server machines shows the top banner only... No tabs, no
> folders,
> > >> nothing below the line, so a developer can't upload without
> switching
> > >> over to the server, and even then there are often errors.
> > >>
> > >> Is there some configuration subtlety we missed?
> > >>
> > >> Otherwise this thing is giving me problems with OutOfMemory errors
> on
> > >> local debugs that I know aren't too big.
> > >>
> > >> Ideas?
> > >> Jody
> > >>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)